What is Madkhali…??


Their is No Sect Called “Madkhali”. Scholars avoid the usage of the Term “Madkhali”

No scholar ever used the Term “Madkhali” for anyone.They did not used this term even for SPUBS ( Salafi Publications). We can call them “Extremists” or “Saa’fiqah” Which These Terms are Used By Ulama. But The scholars forbade the usage of term “Madkhali” even for SPUBS.

Basically The Origin Of The Term “Madkhalis” are Invented by The Khawarij & ikhwanees. They Hate Salafees By Calling Them As A “Madkhali” Who Support Saudi Arabia (The Land Of Tawheed) & Those People Who Don’t Rebel Against The Muslim Rulers. If Any One Calling Ahle Sunnah As A “Madkhali” It Means He is From “Ikhwanis” Or “Khawarij”. So This Is The Asl.

So Avoid Usage of The Term “Madkhali” For Any One. Shaykh Saleh Al-Fawzaan & Other Scholars Warn Against The Usage Of Term Madkhali : Watch Here : CLICK HERE

5 thoughts on “What is Madkhali…??

  1. Amr's avatar

    Can You please say who are your scholars allowed to call the Salafi publications as Extremists or Saafiqah?

    Like

    1. Falcon's avatar

      Bismillah.

      Akhi, I appreciate your question, and I’ll answer it with sincerity, not to cause division but to clarify.

      First, we should remember that our loyalty is to the truth, not to groups or personalities. As Imam Malik (rahimahullah) said:

      “Everyone’s statement can be accepted or rejected, except the one in the grave (i.e., the Prophet ﷺ).”

      Regarding SPUB and the term “Saafiqah” or “extremists”:

      I personally do not base my deen on labeling others quickly, especially not with terms like “extremist” unless there’s clear scholarly backing and context. These issues require ‘ilm, adl (justice), and wara’ (caution).

      But since you asked who among the scholars have criticized SPUB or similar hyper-Madkhali tendencies, here’s a non-exhaustive list of respected scholars who have advised caution regarding extreme partisanship, blind following, and unjust jarh (disparagement) which is often seen in those circles: 🔹 Scholars who warned about Ghuluw (excessiveness) in refutations and cult-like Salafi behaviors:

      1. Shaykh Abdullah al-Duwaish (rahimahullah) – warned against blind refutations without knowledge.
      2. Shaykh Bakr Abu Zayd (rahimahullah) – wrote “Hajr al-Mubtadi’” and other works warning against misuse of jarh wa ta’deel and calling people innovators over minor issues.
      3. Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin al-Abbad (hafidhahullah) – has openly advised against excessive refutations, especially by those claiming Salafiyyah, and warned against fitnah between students of knowledge. He wrote a famous treatise: “Rifqan Ahl al-Sunnah bi Ahl al-Sunnah” (“Gentleness among Ahl al-Sunnah with one another”).
      4. Shaykh Muhammad ibn Hadi (before fallout) – Initially supported refutations but later criticized excessive takfir and tabdi’ happening in some Salafi circles, which led to internal divisions among Madkhalis themselves.
      5. Shaykh Ahmad Bazmool & others – While being respected in Salafi circles, even some of them have called for more balanced manners in disagreements.

      🔸 Important to note:

      • No scholar is infallible, and if SPUB or others engage in beneficial work, it should be acknowledged.
      • However, turning every disagreement into jarh, turning the da’wah into a “who’s refuted who” platform, and warning against scholars like Ibn Uthaymeen, Salih al-Munajjid, or Bilal Philips — as some of their followers do — is not the Salafiyyah of the Prophet ﷺ.

      Summary:

      If someone chooses to benefit from SPUB’s materials, that’s their choice. But when a da’wah becomes centered on refuting fellow Ahl al-Sunnah, dividing over issues of ijtihad, and pushing cult-like loyalty, it is legitimate to warn against those tendencies — not necessarily the entire group.

      Let’s return to:

      • Qur’an and Sunnah with understanding of the righteous scholars.
      • Having husn al-dhann (good opinion) of Muslims.
      • Prioritizing unity upon truth, not division in the name of Salafiyyah.

      May Allah unite us upon haqq, protect us from fitnah, and make us people of ‘ilm, adab, and balance. Ameen.

      Like

  2. Istiak's avatar

    Brother, if a Muslim woman becomes ruler in our country, and if a man rebel against her, is he sinful??

    Like

  3. ...'s avatar

    Muhammad SAW supported Khilafah not a monarchy system monarchy is only permissible in Islam but Khilafah system is supported by Islam

    Like

  4. Falcon's avatar

    Explain to me when Arab became Saudi Arab, and why the need for support for Saudi ,these government are just sitting in tenterhooks rather than doing anything, I don’t see any problem in overthrowing them, as they came into power by betraying and overthrowing the last rulers before them.

    Like

Leave a reply to Istiak Cancel reply

search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close