The Falsehood and Misguidance of Yasir Qadhi Made Plain and Clear


Our Intention is NOT to humiliate or insult anyone, but just to warn the people of wrong messages being conveyed by a person who has some how strayed far away from the teachings of Islam. Such teachings have now been observed to lead people astray from the true teachings of Islam

Regarding Yasir Qadhi He Left the Path of Madina University and enrolled In YALE University ‘s islamic study program 2005. he finished his phd in 2013 . for 8 years he studied Islam under the Atheists , Unbelivers , Innovators , Shia People..

He Himself Said : Yasir Qadhi said I Left the Path of salafies. & also he said Salafi Islam is Trend it is not A Authentic Movement. 

Yasir Qadhi : said “Well I guess 20 years ago when I was a teenager I definitely would have self identified as a Salafi Muslim but over the course of the last decade or so I’ve kind of sort of grown out of the movement now.”

Interviewer: “What does that mean, ‘grown out of the movement’?”

Yasir Qadhi : “I found the movement is not as intellectually stimulating as I would like it to be….“

Listen Interview here :

Astagfirullah .. You Yasir Qadhi …??

Here our Answer is for you in Tafseel :

—>> Yasir Qadhi (born 1975), a self-proclaimed scholar and theologian who works for Al-Maghrib Institute is increasingly misguiding the youth, particularly in Western lands who aren’t connected to the senior erudite Ulemaa as much as they should be due to institutes like Al-Maghrib who actively pursue the goal of separating Muslims from the firmly grounded senior scholars who have fiqh of the religion and instead promote attachment to speakers and instructors who are propped-up to be “shuyookh”.




Yasir Qadhi states:

“It is important to stress, however, that the purpose of this pledge is not to vindicate or justify one ideology over another. These differences have existed within Sunni Islam (in the broad sense of the term) for the last twelve centuries, and the fact of the matter is that, barring some sort of Divine Intervention, it does not appear that these difference will leave us any time soon.

Therefore there needs to be a more pragmatic and realistic attempt at cooperation, one that retains our traditionalisms and respects our historical traditions, yet at the same time takes into account the context of our current political and social situation.”


This call of Yasir Qadhi is to the destruction of the principle of “enjoining the good and forbidding the evil” in the name of unity with the sects of misguidance. May Allaah protect us.



Yasir Qadhi,states in his call to unite truth with falsehood:

Friends you will see More his vedios I will Give you Links below “The one (Yasir Qadhi) who entered into agreements with Ahlul-Bid’ah, severing the ties of his followers, slowly but surely, then he dragged them to cooperate with soofees, shee’ah, setting aside differences and avoiding criticism. “These cowards and sissies with certificates and diplomas stand side-by-side with them (Ahlul-Bid’ah) and cannot speak. It is the scholars who love the Ummah, who will speak when people fail to speak, the scholars who love Allaah, and they are not looking for recognition of the people and approval and applause.


5. Yasir Qadhi, self-proclaimed scholar and Dean of Academic Affairs at Almaghrib Institute,has recently become even more active in requesting the general Muslims to keep away from the scholars of Islaam, and to rely completely on Westernized and apologetic preachers like himself and those connected to his Almaghrib Institute, those currently being set up as replacements for the actual scholars of Islaam.

In a recent speech about “modernity” in December of 2013, Yasir Qadhi tells stories of the “stupidity” of the scholars of Islaam throughout history, and how their rigidity and lack of connection to the people has always kept Islaam and the Muslims from progress.

After laying down the foundations for the scholars to be viewed as a bunch of clowns to be laughed at, he introduces a shining brand of “scholars” who are forward-thinking and actively connected to the people. Who are they? They are the deviant political activists of the Muslim lands, those the scholars of Islaam have warned against time and time again, the likes of Hassan al-Bannaa, founder of the al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon Sect, and Saudi activist Salman al-’Owdah, whom Yasir praises highly as a “forward-thinking realistic scholar”. Also fanatically promoted is Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, in the words of Yasir Qadhi:

One of our main reference points A towering intellectual genius [!]Somebody who understands the Sharee’ah and its applicability in modern timesAn ‘aalim (scholar) with unrivaled scholarship [!]


The clearest goal of the lecture can be found in Yasir Qadhi’s explicit advice for the Muslims, already admittedly disconnected from the scholars, to not refer to scholars overseas, but rather to rely on “local scholars” who understand our lives and our societies! He says:

…You cannot get a fatwaa about living in a secular democracy from somebody who has never lived in a secular democracy. You cannot get a fatwaa about how to interact with your homosexual neighbor when a person has never met a homosexual in his life…

{ Source: His December 7, 2013 His lecture in Detroit entitled “Looking Back as We Look Forward” (at about 52 minutes into the recording). }


If you are paying attention to what Yasir Qadhi is saying here, and Allaah has blessed your intellect with balance and understanding, you should be able to see his goal becoming very clear – Replacing the DISTANT scholars of Islaam with his LOCAL team of brazen forward-


6. In a recent interview on Iranian Shia “Press TV”, Yasir Qadhi re-affirms that he is now a changed man who regrets his previous stances against the Shia cult. Using Tony Blair’s magical rhetoric, he slips away from Shia accusations that he spoke against them, claiming it was based on unverified misinformation he was given in Madinah University! Comparing this to his previous boasting about his level of ‘certain knowledge” about Shia teachings taken directly from their own source books, we can clearly see that Yasir has indeed learned well from his shaikh at Yale University – how to cleverly lie his way out of accusations so cleverly!

Here The Link :


7. Dont Miss to Listen This : Yasir Qadhi, Dean of Academic Affairs at Almaghrib Institute is recognized by the heads of the Ikhwan and Shia as a “changed man”. He has openly denounced “salafism” and now you see what he has replaced it with (if he ever had it to begin with!)

Here The Link :


8. Yasir Qadhi said the following in his lecture: “Towards an Ecumenical Conception of Salafiyah” start from Minute 34:16

“And Salafis need to realise, and I am going to be very blunt here, that if Umar Ibn Khattab (رضي الله عنه) was with us right now and they gave him a quiz of ‘Aqeedah… the fact of the matter is that test that you put in front of him he would fail it!… You would ask ‘Umar Ibn Khattab what are the categories of Tawheed, what do you think he’s going to say? You would ask Umar Ibn Khattab ” الرحمن على العرش استوى” what does it mean explain to me in detail. You would ask ‘Umar Ibn Khattab about the realities and intricacies of abstract issues that they never thought about. You would ask ‘Umar Ibn Khattab even about basic issue of fiqh that you memorize in your textbooks right what are the Nawaqid (nullifiers) of Wuduu, what is the Nawaqid of this, what is this, what are the Shuruut (conditions) of Wuduu, what are the Shuruut of Salaat… “ 

Astagfirullah… Astagfirullah

Here The Link :

–>> Shaykh Ahmed Bazmool { hafithahullah } Refutes the disgusting and foul accusation Yasir Qadhi made on Umar ibn al-Khattab

Link :————————–

9. Yasir Qadhi recently admitted to studying under Tony Blair and other non-Muslim experts on Islam at Yale University for eight years (2005-2013). This has has shocked many of his followers. In this series, we examine his side of the story carefully, so people are not tricked by the magic of beautiful speech.

Part 1 : we examine Yasir’s claim that he did not learn Fiqh from Tony Blair, but rather just politics, a “generic dunya” kind of knowledge.

Link :

Part 2 : we examine what he DID admit to learning from Tony Blair – the magic of rhetoric.

Link :


Abul-‘Abbaas Moosaa Richardson

An analysis of the politicisation of Yasir Qadhi over the years, culminating with his full-circle Ikhwaanee principles. From the most important deviations being his reclassification of politics outside the realm of the Qur’an and Sunnah, his open cooperation with the Shee’ah, and his adaptation of deceitful rhetoric (magical speech) at the hands of famous politicians such as Tony Blair.

Link :    : 86 Mintes                                                                           

From This  Above Audio the topics discussed:

The clear Ikhwaanee methodology of Yasir Qadhi: his catch phrases and trickery

Qadhi’s replacement of the Islamic fiqh of politics with kufree democratic principles

The inner hatred of the Ikhwaanul-Muslimeen (and its various offshoots) for real Islamic politics based on Qur’an and Sunnah

How he DID IN FACT learn ISLAMIC FIQH from Tony Blair

The ruling on learning Islam from non-Muslims

Rebuttal of points of confusion spread by Ikhwanees about taking deen from people of deviation

Examples of the effects of Yasir Qadhi studying for 8 years under non-Muslim academics at YALE (Jahmiyyah, Shee’ah, Walaa’ and Baraa’ etc.)

The magical rhetoric of Tony Blair that Yasir Qadhi admits to learning

Detailed examples of Yasir Qadhi demonstrating the influence of Tony Blair’s magical speech when speaking about Shee’ah: dressing up kufr and misguidance as something tolerable

10. Yasir Qadhi said:

“In conclusion; the Qur’an cannot be then a letter for letter, tashkeel for tashkeel narrative that the later scholars verbalize and the Muslim Ummah is taught. Therefore the preservation must be interpreted in another manner.”

He also said:

“Problem: How can we then understand the Qur’an as being Kalaam Allah (the speech of Allah) when clearly there are human aspects to it.”

He also said that the issue of the Qur’an being the speech of Allah has to be rethought. 

Watch Here : What Happens BEHIND The Scenes In The Da’wah Scene!!! By || Imran Bin Mansoor 

Link :

Our Answer : Belief of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah; we believe that the Qur’an is the words of Allah sent by him and is not created. From him it originates and to him it returns and that it is Allah’s true speech in reality and it is not the speech of anyone else. If it is read, written or memorized it is still the speech of Allah in terms of its letters, its words and its meanings.(Summary of Ibn Taymeeyah’s speech in Waasiteeyah)

The Mu’tazilah, who Imam Ahmad and many of the Imams of that time have classified as disbelievers, believe that the Qur’an is the speech of Allah but created. Their principle regarding this is that the attributes of Allah are created and this led them to clear heresy since if one says that Allah’s descriptions are created he is in fact saying that Allah himself is created which is disbelief.

The Asharis (the Kulabeeyah) believe that the Qur’an is an expression of Allah’s eternal speech as they believe that Allah speaks without letters and voice and doesn’t speak whenever he wants at whatever time he wants hence nullifying Allah’s will and ability from his actions and speech. This is also clear falsehood since Allah spoke to Musa saying: “Verily I am Allah there is nothing worthy of worship but me…”, and it is impossible that the fire or an Angel said this to Musa (غليه السلام)

Now, the rhetoric of these groups DOES NOT contest the issue of the word by word preservation of the Qur’an. Rather, their intention through this rhetoric was to distance Allah from having the qualities of the creation. And although these intentions were good they still ended up in misguidance since they deviated from the Prophetic methodology.

Now, Yasir Qadhi said:

“In conclusion; the Qur’an cannot be then a letter for letter, tashkeel for tashkeel narrative that the later scholars verbalize and the Muslim Ummah is taught. Therefore the preservation must be interpreted in another manner.”

He also said:

“Problem: How can we then understand the Qur’an as being Kalaam Allah (the speech of Allah) when clearly there are human aspects to it.”

He also said that the issue of the Qur’an being the speech of Allah has to be rethought. 

Now, look at that speech and compare it to the Mu’tazilah and the ‘Asharis (who Yasir does not care about being classified with) and we would see that the deviants from the  Mu’tazilah and the ‘Asharis still believe in the divine nature Qur’an (i.e being the speech of Allah). As for Yasir, he questions the very preservation of the Qur’an and its divinity.

Yasir Qadhi’s methodology is reminiscent of that of Jahm Ibn Safwan’s. Instead of acceptance and submission he resorted to dispute, rhetoric and argumentation. Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, the Imam who was famous for his knowledge and his fortitude, said in his book; “Refutation of the Heretics” about Jahm:

“And from that which that has reached us is that Jahm, the enemy of Allah, was from those of Khurasan, from Tirmidh, and he was a person of argumentation and rhetoric” (Refutation of the Heretics: 7)

Now although there are many verses in the Qur’an which refute Yasir’s speech and which clearly state that it is the speech of Allah sent to Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم) the following two verses are those which I think would render Yasir’s arguments null and void.

Allah has said about the Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم):

“And he does not speak from his desires. It is only a revelation unto him.”  Surah Najm {53:3-4}

Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal said regarding this verse:

He (Allah) says that verily Muhammad didn’t speak of this Qur’an from himself. He therefore said “It is”- meaning the Qur’an- “only a revelation unto him.” Therefore Allah has negated that the Qur’an be other than revelation” (Refutation of the Heretics: 11)

Likewise Allah has said in Surah Haaqah (69 :43-47)

” This is the Revelation sent down from the Lord of the Worlds. And if he (Muhammad) had forged a false saying concerning us. We surely would have seized him with the right hand. And we certainly would have cut off his life artery. And none of you could have witheld us from (punishing him).”

Therefore, if it is a revelation  sent by Allah and didn’t come from Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم) and even he; the greatest man to ever walk on this earth, could not invent any statement regarding Allah’s revelation then what evidence of human interference (human element as he calls it) is Yasir speaking about exactly?

In conclusion, We advice to Yasir is to take some time and read the Qur’an and avoid fruitless debate and rhetoric which would put one into clear disbelief. Additionally, after he has fed the Western Masses the perception that the real scholars are unable to deal with contemporary matters I think that since he has doubts about the Qur’an (although he claims to be a theologian) it is about time that he bat in his crease, humble himself and sit under the scholars of Islam rather than Tony Blair.

11. Yasir Qadhi’s Scholars at Yale Univ. (Part 1)

Against the clear advice of the scholars, Yasir Qadhi studied  Islam in Yale University for 8 years, 2005-2013. Three of Yasir Qadhi’s most prominent teachers at Yale University are identified in this video: Tony Blair, Dr. Griffel and Rev. Bowering. More to come (in sha Allah)

Link :


12. Yasir Qadhi said about Hasan Al Banna Fouder of IKHWANUL-MUSLIMEEN SECT As a Scholer of Elite , Intellectual Movers , $ Shakers .

Link :


13. Yasir Qadhi Praises Yosaf Qardawi As Unrivaled scholer , Towering Intellectual Genius!


Link :

–>> Yasir Qadhi even dont dont know those who Praised Innovator he is counted amongst them

1. Shaikh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, “And whoever holds a good opinion of them – and claims that he does not know their true condition – then he is .acquainted with their true condition. So if he does not separate from them and make open his rejection of them, thenhe is to be counted from Amongst them. And as for the one who says that their words have a ta’weel (interpretation) that is in agreement with the Sharee’ah, then he is actually from amongst their leaders and chiefs. And if he is an intelligent person, then he will know his own lie in what he has stated (i.e.knows he is uttering a lie).” (Majmoo al-Fataawaa 2/133)

Again Shaikh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said, “It is obligatory to punish everyone who ascribes himself to them the people of innovation or who defends them, orwho praises them, or who reveres their books, or who detests that they should be talked about, or who begins to make excuses for them by saying he does not understand what these words mean or by saying that this person also authored another book and what is similar to these types of excuses, which are not made except by an ignoramus or a hypocrite. Rather, it is obligatory to punish everyone who knows of their condition and did not assist in repelling their evil, for repelling their evil is one of the greatest of obligations.” Majmoo ul-Fataawaa (2/132)

2. Shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan said : Whoever opposes the manhaj (methodology) of the Salaf and praises the methodologies which oppose the manhaj of the Salaf and praises those who are upon it, then he is considered to be upon the actual opposing methodologies himself. It is necessary to advise him and to call him (to the truth), for if he returns to the truth then so, “otherwise he is to be abandoned and cut off…” (al-Ajwibah al-Mufidah, p.105).

and Other Place

shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan Said : It is not Permissible to elevate the innovator or to PRAISE HIM even if he has some truth with him. because praising and commending him will spread and prmote his Innovation . the salaf used to warn aginst Innovator

Here the sheikh Audio :

3. Shaikh ul-Islaam Ibn Baaz (rahimahullaah) was asked, “The one who praises Ahl ul-Bidah, is he to be counted amongst them???

Sheikh Replyed ::: “Yes, there is no doubt about this, the one who praises them is one who actually calls to them”. [Cassette: Aqwaal ul-Ulamaa Fee Sayyid Qutb]


14. After Yasir Qadhi studied for 8 YEARS under top non-Muslim specialists on Islam, even the likes of TONY BLAIR (!), he responds by claiming that he was giving dawah to Tony Blair! Shaikh Salih Al Fawzan explains the ruling on studying Islam under non-Muslims.

Link :


15. Yasir Qadhi tries to further belittle the status of Islam’s scholars, to lead the people to dismiss the scholars and replace them with Almaghrib Institute instructors and their corrupt dawah of comedy and entertainment in the name of Islamic teachings.

Here Link :


16. Yasir Qadhi shares his vision of a new breed of Western “scholars” who do not carry the baggage and mistakes of overseas “imported” scholars. Another proof for those who warn against this man’s attempts to separate the Western Muslims 

Here Link :


17. Yasir Qadhi is the man behind the curriculum at Almaghrib Institute, and he is directly involved in the education of the Muslims, so we have every right to ask about his education and where he got his understanding from. Be concerned for your din and look to the scholars of your teachers. Do not anyone discourage you from this, since this knowledge is DIN, and we must investigate those who step forward to teach us our din.

Here Link :


18. In these clips from an official Almaghrib Institute promotional trailer, Yasir Qadhi and his sufi ashari friend Suhaib Webb joke around like little schoolboys.

Here Link :


19 . Yasir Qadhi given permission that Any one can follow Blind Taqleed with any school of thought Hanafi, shafi, maliki, hambali, he said it is not an issue whether you say ameen or not , whether you do rafaydein or not…?? every one of this position you will find evidences from Sahaba and tabien..

very Imp 

And Also He said From 6th minute. if your shaikh said do rafyadein then you do Rafaydein . if your shaikh said dont do rafaydein then you dont do rafayadein… what ever you do dont break the community .. 


here the vedio Link :


20. Yasir Qadhi attempts to drive a wedge between the Muslims and their scholars by introducing a local vs overseas distinction that leads to complete distrust in the real scholars with complete trust in Yasir’s band of merry entertainers at Almaghrib Institute, propped up as ‘local’ replacements for the ‘far-away unconcerned and ill informed’ scholars. What a plot he hatches! Shadeed Muhammad follows suit, targeting the African American community in similar fashion.

Here Link :


21. Yasir Qadhi Said Siraj Wahhaj is a ‘LIVING LEGEND

At an ikhwani ICNA conference, shameless modernist Yasir Qadhi exaggerates his praise of Siraj Wahhaj, shattering his back into scattered shards

Here The Link :

22. Yasir Qadhi’s Ikhwanee Manhaj exposed once again!

Link :


Salafi scholers & Speakers Refuted Yasiir Qadhi

1. Shaykh Saalih ibn Fawzaan al-Fawzaan

A response to Yasir Qadhi’s call to abandonment of the Scholars, to enter a new epoch of localised Western scholarship, a modernity of Islam prefaced on a renaissance guided by al-Maghrib Institute.

Link :

2. Shaykh Ahmed Bazmool { hafithahullah } Refutes the disgusting and foul accusation Yasir Qadhi made on Umar ibn al-Khattab

Link :

3. Response to Yasir Qadhi’s Innovated Teachings | Shaykh Muhammad Amān Al-Jāmī

Link :

4. Yasir Qadhi´s severe deviancy – Exposed & Refuted | By Moosa Richardson

Link :

5. Refutation of Yasir Qadhi by | Abul Hasan Maalik

Link :

6 . Yasir Qadhi Will Seperate You from the Scholars | Abu Abbas Moosa Richardson

Link :

7. What Happens BEHIND The Scenes In The Da’wah Scene!!! By || Imran Bin Mansoor 

Link :

Dua : May Allah Guide yasir qadhi in Sirataal-MustaQeem & May Allah Give Him correct ILM To Take The Path of Manhaj-us-Salaf Ameen………….!!! 

Brothers And Sisters : Refutations goes with strong evidences and we Salafis Refute Anyone who opposes the Manhaj Salaf, in Aqeeda & Manhaj As

Sheikh Saleh Fawzan said : “” If you are sure about their errors and their deviation, you are one hundred percent sure, and you have the ability and the knowledge to explain, then it is a duty upon you to do this.”“,

{ Reference: Sahab Salafi Network online forum, Al-Allaamah Al-Fawzaan: whoever has the ability, and knows and is sure about the deviation of some group is obliged to explain it (Arabic) } MP-3 CLICK HERE

Refutation can be as a Naseehat to the Soo Called Individulas in today Generations . save others from misguidance of that deviant individulas As we seen today .

There fore “There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator or the sinner who openly professes his evil.

Daleel : IT was Narrated that Affan bin Muslim said ” We were with Ismail bin Ulayyah A Man Narrated a Report from Another Man.. I SAID THAT THIS ONE IS NOT RELIABLE.. The Man Said you BACK BITTING About him . Ismail said ” He is not back bitting Rather he judged that he not Reliable {Sahih Muslim, Mukdima, Hadith No.84 }

Imam Muslim Said : chapter 5 ; Clarifiction that the chain of naration is the part if Religion , and the reports sholud be only be narrated from those who are trustworthy and that critical Asessment and the evaluation of narrators for things that are true is perssible and is in face ” OBLIGATORY. and that doing so is not BICK Bitting that is forbidden Rather it is Defending the Honaroble sharia.



3 thoughts on “The Falsehood and Misguidance of Yasir Qadhi Made Plain and Clear

  1. I guess you people are just fighting with each other, may Allah protect you. You all distract muslims. Now we have to study all on our own. Shame to all of you. Go keep saying others that they are unbelievers, yet you don’t know that you are yourself falling into this continuous abyss.
    In Islam their will be 73 sects, only 1 sect will go into Heaven, those who won’t make sects, who will just say that they are muslims and don’t belong to any sects. May Allah protect us from all of you. You need to know, that Muslims going away from Islam, is all happening because of you people.
    We should follow Quran and Sunnah, and take look at school of thoughts, read the fiqh, and see which ideology and explanation is more closer to Quran and Hadith, and follow that, rather than saying kafirs to each other.


  2. A very enlightening discourse.Please also let me know if Qadi as i have heard said that laws of stoning and beheading are barbaric and should be thrown out of the books and not be implemented etc.Please provide me with some videos also.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close